Liêm chính và khoa học mở
A “Smith (1998) found” copied from someone else’s paper can carry their mistake for twenty years. How to cite honestly when you cannot get the original, check c
Liêm chính và khoa học mở
A message offers third-author position on a paper “about to be accepted” in an indexed journal. How paper mills operate, why their products get caught, and the
Liêm chính và khoa học mở
Three years on, a journal asks for the raw data behind Figure 4 and you have changed laptops twice. What to record, paper or electronic notebooks, and how long
Liêm chính và khoa học mở
Accepting a review invitation means holding unpublished work in confidence. When to decline, how to involve a PhD student properly, and the things a reviewer mu
Liêm chính và khoa học mở
A reviewer wants seven papers by the same author, or an editor nudges you to cite the journal: how to recognise coercive citation, citation cartels and excessiv
Liêm chính và khoa học mở
Splitting one survey into three papers, republishing a paper in another language, reusing old data: where legitimate use of a dataset ends and redundant publica
Liêm chính và khoa học mở
Can you boost contrast on a faint blot? Splice lanes from two gels? A practical classification of image edits that are fine, edits you must declare and edits th
Công bố quốc tế
An invitation promising review in seven days; a website identical to a respected journal but on a different domain. How to tell predatory, hijacked and grey-zon
Liêm chính và khoa học mở
Having a conflict of interest is not misconduct; hiding one is. How to spot financial and non-financial conflicts, model disclosure wording, and when reviewers
Liêm chính và khoa học mở
Authorship disputes tend to erupt just before submission, when everyone is tired. The four ICMJE criteria, CRediT roles and an early written agreement prevent m
